home
Joe F.
Growth Stock Investor &
Market Strategist
Joe
F. Trade the Cycles Updated 3-5-06
Growth Stock (NASDAQ) Timeliness - Monday - Untimely
(Weakness/a downtrend, that could follow a gap up at the
open and early strength,
during "much" of Monday's
session is a
"hit!.")
- Short Term Cycle (7-14 Days) - Untimely
(NDX/QQQ are probably in short
term downcycles as of 3-3-06.)
- Minor Intermediate Term Cycle (4-10 Weeks) - Untimely
(NDX
minor intermediate
term downcycle is in effect.)
Brief Cycles Summary
(Analysis/Commentary follows)
NASDAQ
100 Very Long Term Downcycle/Secular Bear Market = Down since
March 24, 2000 Bull Market peak/very long term cycle high at 4816.35.
NASDAQ 100 Long Term Cycle
= Up since long term
cycle low at 1301.93 on 8-13-04.
S & P 500
Very Long Term Downcycle/Secular Bear Market = Down
since
March 24, 2000 Bull Market peak/very long term cycle high at 1552.87.
S & P 500
Long Term Cycle = Up
since 8-13-04 long
term cycle low at 1060.72. SPX is working it's
way up to the
very long term downcycle trendline.
XAU (Philadelphia
Gold/Silver Index) Very Long Term Upcycle/Secular
Bull Market = Began October 25, 2000 at 41.61 Bear Market/very
long term cycle low.
XAU (Philadelphia
Gold/Silver Index) Long Term Cycle (heading up) = Began May 10,
2004 at 76.79 long term cycle low. Long term cycle high occurred at
113.41 on 1-6-04.
HUI
(AMEX Gold Bugs Index) Very Long Term Upcycle/Secular
Bull Market = Began on November 15, 2000 at 35.31
Bear Market/very long term
cycle low.
HUI
(AMEX Gold Bugs Index) Long Term Cycle (heading up)
= Began May 10, 2004 at 163.81 long term cycle low. Long term cycle
high occurred at 258.60 on 12-2-03.
Please see Cycles Summary for the details of the
cycles that are the basis for my market timing system.
For those of you who entered this page directly and haven't
discovered
the vast resources on the home page yet please check out Joe F. Rocks! Growth Stock Investor &
Market Strategist, don't forget to bookmark it and please tell your
colleagues and friends.
Analysis/Commentary
-
The
NASDAQ Composite (COMPX)
opened significantly lower
on Friday 3-3, but,
COMPX trended
higher most of the session then plunged the last two hours, spent much
of the
session
in positive territory, but closed modestly lower
at 2302.60, -8.51 (-0.37%).
The long term downcycle trendlines
for NDX (NASDAQ
100) and SPX (S & P
500) were
broken during the week ending 11-5-04, and (unexciting because of the
very long term downcycle since March 2000) long term cycle buy signals
occurred shortly thereafter. Long
term cycle lows occurred at 1301.93
on 8-13-04 for NDX and at 1060.72 for SPX. NDX and SPX both remain in
very long term downcycles since March 2000 (see SPX chart dated 11-16-04).
The chart below is the latest "wall of
worry" chart. Keep in
mind the
relativistic nature of the wall of worry with VXN (NDX (NASDAQ
100) wall of worry)
and VIX (SPX (S & P 500) wall of worry) rising
faster in %
terms than NDX and SPX fall portending strength and
vice versa. The collapse of the wall of worry for both
NDX and SPX
until mid May 2004 correctly
portended
a collapse in those indices, with long term cycle lows occurring
on 8-13-04. NDX (see second chart
below), and probably soon SPX, is in
a minor intermediate
term downcycles (2% follow through sell signals occurred
for
NDX and SPX, see second chart below for NDX),
and they
are in major
intermediate term
upcycles
(see second chart below for NDX), but the Cyclical Bull Market since
October 2002 has rolled over/flattened out, so risk is high from a big
picture standpoint.

"Eerie
Nikkei-SPX
Parallels" (At Zeal) shows the high degree of
correlation between the S & P 500's and NASDAQ's post bubble
behavior and that of the
Japanese stock market that experienced a bubble in 1989 and remains at much lower levels 17
years later.
As one can see
in the NDX
(NASDAQ 100) charts below, a long term (1 to 3 years) cycle high
occurred on
1-20-04 at 1559.47 and a long term cycle low occurred at 1301.93
on 8-13-04. The collapse of the wall of worry
from late November 2003 until late January 2004 and the dramatic trend
change in NASDAQ
Institutional Money
Flow 124 weeks ago to negative/outflows correctly portended a
trend change. Given last week's negative NASDAQ
Institutional Money
Flow, some weakness is indicated this week, but cycle
channels/trendlines are the primary market timing consideration. A
minor intermediate term downcycle is in place, because an important 2%
minor intermediate term cycle sell signal occurred recently (see first
chart below). An Elliot Wave ABC down up down minor
intermediate term downcycle is in effect, with a Wave B short
term upcycle possibly still in effect at Friday 3-3's close, or the
Wave C short term downcycle may have begun.
The very long term downcycle (8-20
years in duration) which began in March 2000 probably has about 12 years to go. Paper
assets (and hard assets in reverse fashion) tend to have very
long term cycles that last about 35
years with about 17.5 years up (1982-2000) and 17.5 years down
(2000-2018ish). There were very long term cycle highs (paper
asset bubbles) in 1897, 1929, 1965ish, and in 2000 (about 35 years
apart on average).
A major intermediate
term upcycle is in effect since early May 2005. In the first chart one
can see that a major intermediate term cycle buy signal
occurred in late May 2005/early June 2005 for NDX, but one must be
conservative given the primary Bear Market/very
long term downcycle
since March 2000. A major
intermediate term cycle
buy signal is in effect for NDX and SPX. A risky NDX long term cycle
buy signal
occurred because of the very long term downcycle since March 2000 and
outflows
nearly every week the past 124 weeks (see chart below).


















NASDAQ Institutional Money
Flow (block trading data, 10,000+ share blocks) "portends"
(this isn't
a good
one week look ahead indicator except when there's a well established
multiweek trend and the minor intermediate term cycle agrees with it)
some weakness this week ending 3-10 (a minor
intermediate
term downcycle is in place at 3-3-06's close, which is the
most
important
consideration, because a 2% follow through sell signal occurred)
with 1.96% (398) more downtick blocks during
the
week ending 3-3. This
primary
fundamental indicator has reliably predicted the NASDAQ's direction,
having turned positive in March 2003 after being negative for about
three years following the March 2000 bubble peak/very long term cycle
high. NASDAQ
Institutional Money
Flow
turned negative again 124 weeks ago however and has
generally been
substantially negative, which resulted in a
sharp
decline until 8-13-04's long term cycle low.
On a positive note there has been very strong NYSE
Institutional
Money Flow for well over four years which explains why the Dow (value
stock
oriented) held up
much better than the NASDAQ (growth stock oriented) prior to NDX's
10-8-02
long
term cycle low.
Breadth, a primary fundamental indicator, was negative on
Friday 3-3 with NASDAQ A/D at more
than 17:12
in favor of declining
issues and NASDAQ Up/Down Volume was in favor of down volume by nearly
13:11.
The NASDAQ wall of worry (VXN
(NASDAQ 100 Volatility Index) and QQV
(QQQ Volatility Index)) grew on Friday 3-3
with
VXN
revealing that a significant (0.50-1.99%)
rise in fear
occurred
for
NDX
(NASDAQ 100) and QQV
revealed that a significant (0.50-1.99%)
rise in fear
occurred for
QQQQ
(NASDAQ 100 Tracking Stock). The NASDAQ
is deemed Untimely on Monday
due to the
short term as well as minor intermediate term downcycles
despite NDX's significant rise in fear on
Friday.
Better than
expected economic
data
may result in strength.
Williams %R for NDX is at
-39.82 on 3-3-06 (below
-80 (near the bottom) on my chart
is the (look to) "buy" area (oversold) and above -20 is the look
to "sell"
area (overbought)). NDX is on a major intermediate
term cycle buy signal (5%
follow through after breaking it's intermediate term downcycle
trendline).
NDX hit a minor intermediate term cycle 2%
follow through sell signal recently (see first chart above).
An Elliot Wave ABC down up down minor intermediate term
downcycle is in effect, with a Wave B short term upcycle
possibly still in effect at Friday 3-3's close, but Wave C appears have
begun. MACD
is on a buy signal (above it's moving average).
RSI and Stochastics are on buy signals.
A
significant rise
in fear occurred
for the NASDAQ 100 on Friday with
VXN
(NASDAQ 100 Volatility Index) rising +0.28 (+1.75%) to 16.27
while
NDX
(NASDAQ 100) fell -9.46 (-0.56%) to 1684.32 which
reveals
that a significant (0.50-1.99%)
rise in fear occurred for NDX
because
VXN
rose significantly more than
NDX
fell (NDX
wall of worry grew) which portends strength in NDX
on Monday, but, a
short
term downcycle is in place at session's end on Friday 3-3.
A minor intermediate term downcycle is in effect,
because a 2% follow through sell signal occurred.
A significant (0.50-1.99%) (-0.58% decline in
QQQQ + +1.46% rise in QQV = +0.88%
which is a +0.88%
rise in fear) +0.88% rise
in fear occurred
for
QQQQ
(NASDAQ 100 Tracking Stock, -0.24 (-0.58%) to 41.45) on
Friday
since
QQQQ fell
significantly less than
QQV
rose (QQQ Volatility
Index, +0.22
(+1.46%)
to 15.26)
(QQQQ
wall of worry grew) which portends strength
in
QQQQ
on Monday, but, a short
term downcycle
is in place at session's end on Friday 3-3.
A
minor intermediate term downcycle is in effect, a
2% follow through sell signal occurred.
On Friday
VIX
(which is
now calculated using the implied volatility of SPX
(S & P 500) options instead of OEX (S & P 100) options) rose
+0.24 (+2.05%) to 11.96 versus a decline in SPX
of -1.91 (-0.15%) to 1287.23 which was a significant
(0.50-1.99%)
rise in fear (wall of worry grew)
for the
S
& P 500/value stocks (SPX
is about 75% value stocks) since VIX
rose sharply versus
SPX
falling slightly (S & P 500) which portends
strength
in
SPX
on Monday, but,
it's in a short
term downcycle at
session's end on
Friday 3-3.
The S & P 500
(SPX) is deemed Untimely
on Monday
due to the short
term downcycle.
A short
term downcycle is in
place
at Friday 3-3's close which
usually would
lead to weakness/a downtrend on Monday
if it remains in place.
Better
than
expected economic
data
may result in some strength. MACD
is on a buy signal (above it's moving average). Stochastics is
on a buy signal but RSI is trending down prior to
becoming overbought, which is a negative
indication because the RSI trend is weaker than SPX's trend the past
few weeks.
Williams
%R
for SPX
is near overbought territory at
-26.36 on 3-3-06 (below
-80 (near the bottom) on my chart
is
the (look to) "buy" area (oversold) and
above -20 is the look to
"sell" area (overbought)). SPX
is on a major intermediate
term cycle buy signal (5%
follow through after breaking it's intermediate term downcycle
trendline). SPX is in a minor intermediate term downcycle
(2%
follow through sell signal occurred).
The CBOE Total Put/Call Ratio at an elevated (at or above 0.75 but
below 0.90) level
= 0.87 at Friday's
close points to some weakness/volatility on Monday due to the elevated
level of fear (the
CBOE
Index
Put/Call
Ratio at an extremely high 1.41 points to weakness/volatility),
because
it's
a
reliable
non-contrarian
indicator of the next session's early action except at very high
(at
or above 1.05) or very low levels (at or below 0.50) where it sometimes
is also a contrarian indicator (sometimes portends early substantial
strength
(below 0.50) or a sharp rally following early potentially severe
weakness
(at or above 1.05), judgement is involved). Please keep in mind that cycle
channels/trendlines are the most important consideration when timing
any
market.
Looking at NASDAQ 100 (NDX) Chicago Mercantile Exchange
Commitments
of Traders - Futures Only (Reportable
Positions
as of February 28, 2006),
the Speculators (hedge funds and
other
speculators/traders) added 451
long
futures contracts
and covered 384 short
futures contracts which portends weakness
this week
(contrarian indicator),
whereas,
the Commercial Traders added 2372 long
futures contracts and added 2683 short
futures contracts which portends weakness
this week (non
contrarian indicator), but the significant long trade points to
some strength, but much of the strength may have occurred
last week because the data is three days old when released on 3-3.
NDX
is in a minor
intermediate term downcycle, since a 2%
follow through sell signal
occurred.
Keep in mind that the data is three days stale when released. Cycle
trendlines/channels are the primary market timing consideration.
NDX COT (do an
edit then find "nasdaq" in Internet Explorer or Netscape to find it
because
it's near the bottom)
American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) % Bullish
(AAII has been a useful non-contrarian sentiment indicator at
very
low levels below 40% bullish and very high levels above 60%
bullish.)
@ 40.9% bullish last week
from 43.2% the
prior
week
is a neutral factor for the prospects of stocks during
the week ending 3-10-06 because
it's at a mid range
level of
bullishness (between
40-60%).
The
change in or delta AAII % bullish is also a
useful
short term/weekly look ahead indicator in addition to the absolute
value of AAII % bullish. The sharp decline last
week
is a negative factor for the prospects of
stocks during
the week ending 3-10-06 because it's a sharp
rise in fear for
this useful non-contrarian sentiment indicator.
For
now I'm using delta AAII % Bullish as a non contrarian
indicator and I haven't determined exactly what significant changes are
versus sharp or very sharp, etc. Since it appears to be strictly non
contrarian (so far), I don't have to determine what an unusually large
change is where the indicator becomes contrarian. The absolute value
does become contrarian at extremely low (0-30% bullish) or extremely
high (70-100% bullish) values, at least from an intermediate term cycle
standpoint (a few weeks/months).
Gold & Silver Stocks
- Wave
4's Wave C Short Term Downcycle Is In Effect
- Reliable
lead indicator NEM's 2 month chart dated 3-3-06 (third
chart) reveals that it's cycle low two weeks ago was in fact a Wave A
short term cycle low not the start of the major upcycle's (since
5-16-05) Wave 5. The
major upcycle Wave 4's Wave C short term downcycle
began on 3-2 for HUI (see
latest 1 year chart), on 2-24 for NEM (see 2 month chart dated 3-3-06, third
chart), and on 2-22
for XAU (see latest 1 year
chart), so severe weakness is likely this week, and, a great buying
opportunity in
anticipation of the major upcycle's Wave 5 is rapidly approaching.
- "Trade the Cycles" Near Term
Synopsis - NEM underperformed
the XAU last
week
by a very wide margin of -6.12%,
so the NEM Lead Indicator is extremely bearish, which jives with Wave
4's parabolic Wave C short term
downcycle being in effect. Note in
the last chart
(first chart group) below how NEM led to the upside a
few months ago and
has led to the downside recently. This is the most bearish weekly
NEM Lead Indicator I remember seeing.
The gold COT (Commitments Of Traders) data points to weakness this
week: The
gold Commercial Traders sold 347 long
futures and options contracts
and added 4974 short futures and
options contracts which portends weakness
this week (non
contrarian
indicator).
The collapse in the XAU
Put/Call
Ratio to 0.78629 (March expiration) on 3-3 versus 0.92033 (March expiration) on 2-24 versus
1.30761
(expired February
expiration) on 2-17 despite XAU weakness points to a
substantial decline soon. XAU
Implied Volatility fell -1.13% to 34.625
on Friday 3-3 from 35.020 on 3-2 versus a -1.40% decline
in the XAU on 3-3, which is a sharp (2-2.99%) +2.53%
rise
in complacency (-1.13%
+ -1.40%
= -2.53%.
The XAU wall of worry shrank by -2.53%,
therefore complacency rose
by +2.53%)
that portends weakness/a downtrend
during part of Monday 3-6's session. Monday 2-13 was
NEM's Wave A short term cycle low (see NEM 2 month chart, third chart) not the beginning of the major
upcycle's (since 5-16-05, see
1 year charts) Wave 5, because the cycle low occurred
too far
above the major upcycle trendline to be a likely Wave 4
cycle
low (currently at about 255,
48, and 117 for HUI/NEM/XAU, see
latest
1 year charts). The major
upcycle trendlines could turn up, with Wave 4 cycle lows occurring above the current trendlines, but it
was
unlikely that they would turn up as much as they would have if the
cycle
lows three weeks ago were Wave 4 cycle lows. Remember that the previous parabolic major
upcycle's
Wave 4 in 2003 lasted 7 weeks for HUI/XAU and -25%+ declines occurred
(see XAU 3 year chart dated 5-16-05).
It appears that each of Wave 4's three Waves will last about
two weeks, for an approximate 6 week correction that began with Wave 3
cycle highs on 1-31-06. So, the major upcycle's Wave 5 should begin in
mid March, which is
when it began in the previous parabolic major upcycle in 2003
(on March 13, 2003). Shortly
after NEM fills it's downside gap at 48.75 from 12-7 and the XAU fills it's downside gap at 122.49
from 12-22 Wave 4 should bottom. Based on that and the latest major upcycle trendlines (see latest
1 year charts) my Wave 4 cycle low target ranges are 255-265 for HUI,
47-49 for NEM, and
117-122 for the XAU. This
means that the
maximum downside
in Wave 4 for the more volatile HUI (than NEM/XAU) is about -27%, since
HUI peaked very near 350 in Wave 3. It appears
that gold
will bottom above $500 (see
1
year chart). NEM's Wave B short term upcycle began at
53.21 on 2-13 shortly
after filling it's downside gap at 53.40 from 1-3-06, and, ended on
2-24. Federal
Reserve Bank Credit (released
after Thursday 3-2's
close, see http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/Current/)
rose a sharp +$4.950 Billion
in the week ending 3-1-06 which portends some probably short lived
modest strength during the next few
days
to a week, because
HUI/NEM/XAU's cycles, the primary market timing consideration, point to
extreme weakness this week.
Also, the Fed's massive $18.250 Billion in Repos on Thursday 3-2 (see http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm?SHOWMORE=TRUE)
contributed to a sharp +2.67% rise in the XAU on Thursday 3-2 and
should lead to some
probably
short lived modest strength this week. In NEM's 1
year chart
dated
2-3-06
note (fourth chart, very important) the Elliot Wave 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 minor
intermediate term upcycle from
5-16-05 until 9-30-05, which is why I believe 9-30-05 was the major
upcycle's Elliot Wave 1 cycle high and arrived at the current count,
with 1-31's cycle high being the end of the major upcycle's (since
5-16-05) Wave 3 for HUI/NEM/XAU. NEM has downside gaps to
fill at 51.59 from 12-28, at
50.45 from 12-22, and at 48.75 from 12-7, and, the XAU has downside
gaps to fill at 133.35 from 3-1, at
128.03
from 1-3, at 124.36 from 12-28, and at 122.49 from 12-22.
Often
cycle highs or lows will occur
shortly after gaps get filled, so one needs to track gaps closely. If
gaps don't get
filled that can be a bearish or bullish sign, as occurred recently when
NEM twice closely approached (daily cycle lows at 48.88 and 48.89) but
didn't fill it's downside gap at 48.75, then the recent explosive rally
occurred. The Elliot Wave 3 minor int term
cycle highs that occurred on 1-31-06 are important though not
major/final cycle highs, because
the
major upcycle's Elliot Wave 5 cycle high probably lies ahead of us and
should occur in
the 400-450 range for HUI, based on
extrapolating the prior long term
cycle highs since late 2000 when the Bull Market/very long term upcycle
began. Gold
hit a 2% follow through minor intermediate term cycle sell signal ten
weeks ago.
- "Trade the Cycles" Big Picture Synopsis - The
most
important market timing consideration, therefore the most important
thing to remember, is that HUI,
NEM, and the XAU are in the sharply
rising phase of the long term
upcycle (began on May 10, 2004) since May 16, 2005's major
intermediate term cycle lows (see latest charts), and,
this major upcycle should
last until
about July 2006 based on the fact that the long term cycles have been
getting progressively longer (see first chart below and the HUI chart
dated 5-12-05). HUI,
NEM, and the XAU have been in a true Bull Market/very long term upcycle
since October (NEM/XAU)/November (HUI) 2000 (see first chart below and
the
XAU chart dated 7-12-05). They've been in a long term upcycle since May
10, 2004 (see first chart below and the HUI chart dated August 5).
They've been in a major intermediate term upcycle since May 16, 2005
(see latest charts). Gold
began a very long term
upcycle/true Bull Market in April 2001 and silver did so in late 2001. Elliot
Wave Theory
(see NEM chart dated 8-12-05 and the XAU chart dated
5-16-05)
complements cycle channels/trendlines nicely (as do gaps), but is a
secondary market timing tool, because cycle channels/trendlines are
the primary market timing consideration.
-
The
"Trade the Cycles"
Blog (see link) is typically updated a few times each day, so in
this likely 6 weekish Wave 4 correction, it will provide you with the
current "Trade the Cycles" assessment.
From the Blog: "The
parabolic/sharply declining Wave C short term downcycle of the major
upcycle's (since 5-16-05) Wave 4 minor intermediate term downcycle
(since 1-31-06) is such a dominant factor right now that the indicators
other than maybe the NEM Lead Indicator aren't that important right now.
"
- I see some analysts saying that
gold leads or at least leads much of the time. I've seen gold bottom
only once (February 2005) before HUI/NEM/XAU did (5-16-05 major
intermediate term cycle low), but it still lagged gold stocks "cycle
buy signalwise," since HUI/NEM/XAU hit a major buy signal a few weeks before
gold did last year. Gold didn't take off (rising bottoms uptrend line)
until HUI/NEM/XAU began a major upcycle on 5-16-05, which is
the sharply rising parabolic major upcycle of the long term upcycle
since 5-10-04. Some data: Gold peaked in early February
2006 while HUI/NEM/XAU did so on 1-31-06, hitting Wave 3 minor
intermediate
term cycle highs. Gold began a Bull Market in April 2001 while HUI/NEM/XAU did so in late 2000. HUI/NEM/XAU hit long term cycle highs on
Dec 2, 2003 (HUI/NEM)/Jan 6, 2004 (XAU) while gold did in April
2004. HUI/NEM/XAU hit a major cycle high in mid November
2004 while
gold did in early December 2004. Gold lags.
- Last week's NEM earnings miss was no surprise, from last
week's update: NEM execs sold (or reported or both) en masse on 2-3-06,
only three days after the 1-31-06 Wave 3 Minor Intermediate Term Cycle
Highs for HUI, NEM, and the XAU (see http://finance.yahoo.com/q/it?s=NEM).
The list includes the Chairman and the
President and appears to be about 12 top execs all selling and/or
reporting on the same day, which points to an important
cycle high, though my system/work indicates that it was an important
Elliot Wave 3 cycle high and not the final/major cycle high for the
major upcycle since 5-16-05, that will also be the long term cycle high
for the long term upcycle since 5-10-04, and, if my Elliot Wave count
is correct (see second chart), will be the Cyclical Bull's cycle high
for the first of three Cyclical Bulls (Waves 1, 3, and 5) in this
Secular Bull/very long term upcycle since late 2000 for HUI/NEM/XAU.
There should be two Cyclical Bear Markets
corresponding to Elliot Waves 2 and 4 of this Secular
Bull/very long term upcycle since late 2000 for HUI/NEM/XAU.
- As discussed in recent weeks (I
left
the bullets in, they can be found after the charts) Elliot Wave (see
second chart) suggests that HUI/NEM/XAU
are due for a 12-18+ month Cyclical Bear Market after long term cycle
highs occur later this year, because this is the third long term
upcycle or fifth Elliot Wave of the first Wave 1 Cyclical Bull Market
of the Secular Bull Market that began in late 2000. HUI/NEM/XAU
are due
timewise for a Cyclical Bear Market since very long term upcycles (and
downcycles) last about 17-18 years on average and HUI/NEM/XAU
will
be about 6 years into this very
long term upcycle later this year when Elliot Wave 5 long term and Elliot Wave 1 Cyclical Bull Market cycle highs will
probably occur, since the Secular Bull Market/very long term upcycle
began in October 2000 for NEM/XAU and in November 2000 for HUI. Notice
in the second chart how far the XAU is above it's Secular Bull Market/very long term upcycle
trendline. The Cyclical Bear Market will "simply" (painful
yes) bring HUI/NEM/XAU back to
their Secular Bull Market trendlines, which could turn up some, so they
may bottom in a few years above where those trendlines would be based
on the current trendlines. Many
and probably most Junior gold/silver stocks
and some non
Juniors should run mightily in HUI/NEM/XAU's Cyclical Bear Market due
to begin once long term cycle highs occur later this year, because many (probably most) Junior gold/silver stocks' cycles dramatically lag those of HUI/NEM/XAU's. So, there should be a lot of money to be
made during HUI/NEM/XAU's
Cyclical Bear Market.
- The cycle types are Secular Bull or Bear Market/very long term
up or downcycle, Cyclical Bull or Bear Market, long term up or
downcycle,
major intermediate term up or downcycle, minor intermediate term
up or downcycle, monthly up or downcycle, short term up or downcycle,
and
very short term up or downcycle. Each upcycle is nearly always
comprised of
five Elliot Waves contained in a few of the next shorter cycles'
cycles and each downcycle is nearly always comprised of three Elliot
Waves contained in a few of the next shorter cycles'
cycles. Each
cycle is comprised of an up and down cycle of course, so really the
complete cycles are very long term cycle (about 35 years up and down),
cyclical Bull/Bear cycle (about 7 years), long term cycle (about 2
years), major intermediate term cycle (about 6-12 months), minor
intermediate term cycle (a few months), monthly cycle (1-2 months),
short term cycle (2-3 weeks), and very short term cycle (a few days to
a week).
- The latest COT data (as of 2-28-06) is bearish short
term since the gold
Commercial
Traders traded significantly net short and the gold
Speculators traded significantly net long, both of which
portend weakness for much of this week. The
gold Commercial Traders sold 347
(added 228, 4848, 4679 the
prior
three weeks, sold 15,347 the prior week, added
343, 10,554, 13,289, 6357
the
prior four weeks,) long
futures and options contracts
and added 4974 (covered 1317 the
prior week, added 1765 the prior week, covered
9233, 18,701, 8435 the prior three weeks)
short futures and
options contracts
which portends weakness this week (non
contrarian
indicator).
The
gold Speculators
(hedge
funds and other speculators/traders) added 4662 (sold
5614, 10,272, 5910 the prior three
weeks, added
44 the prior week, sold
6157 the prior week, added 5541, 2975, 1521
the prior three weeks) long futures
and options contracts
and covered 2621 (covered 2300, 3511
the prior two weeks, added 5621, 1047,
1783, 3743, 9445, 5824
the prior six weeks)
short futures
and options contracts
which
portends weakness this
week (contrarian
indicator). The
most
important consideration in timing any market is the cycle
channels/trendlines (see
charts below).
















- The remainder of the charts can
be found at
the
bottom.
- HUI, NEM, and the XAU are in an
Elliot Wave 5 long term upcycle
since 5-10-04 (see first chart above), which is the third long term
upcycle
of the first/Elliot
Wave 1
cyclical Bull Market of the secular Bull Market/very long term upcycle
that began in Oct 2000 (NEM/XAU)/Nov 2000 (HUI). There should be two
more cyclical Bull Markets corresponding to Waves 3 and 5 of the
secular Bull Market after this one peaks later this year. In the first
chart I labeled the first major upcycle a long term upcycle, but it was
only a six month major intermediate term upcycle that was the first
segment/major upcycle of the long term upcycle that peaked in May 2002.
The first
cyclical Bear Market/long term downcycle of this secular Bull
Market/very long term upcycle (since late 2000), corresponding to
the secular Bull's Elliot Wave 2 down, is likely after long term cycle
highs occur later this year and will probably last 12-18
months, based on gold/silver stocks such as CDE (Coeur D' Alene Mines),
MNG (Miramar Mining), NXG (Northgate Minerals Corp), RGLD (Royal Gold),
and SIL (Apex Silver Mines) completing 14-16 month long term
downcycles/cyclical
Bear Markets in May
2005, that began after their early 2004 long term cycle highs. Their
long term downcycles/cyclical
Bear Markets all did Elliot Wave A, B, C down up down patterns.
- Now for HUI/NEM/XAU's Bull
Market/very long term upcycle (since late 2000) Elliot Wave count! The
long term cycle high that occurred in mid 2002 appears to be the Wave 1
cycle high (see first chart above). The
long term cycle high that occurred on Dec 2, 2003 for HUI/NEM/Jan 6,
2004 for the XAU appears to be the Wave 3 cycle high. The long term cycle high that will occur in
this long term upcycle later this year will probably be the final Wave
5 cycle high of the first
cyclical gold/silver stock Bull Market within a primary/secular
very long term Bull Market that may last 15-20 years or more, possibly
until the year 2020 and beyond. The previous secular Bear market/very
long term downcycle lasted about 21 years, from 1980 until April 2001
for gold. However, the
interesting thing is that many gold/silver stocks
dramatically lag HUI/NEM/XAU's
cycles. CDE, Coeur D' Alene Mines, a silver (with some gold) stock, MNG
(Miramar Mining), NXG (Northgate Minerals Corp), RGLD (Royal Gold), and
SIL, Apex Silver Mines, hit long term cycle lows in May 2005 about a
year after HUI/NEM/XAU did for
example. Some silver stocks lag simply because silver's Bull Market
lags gold's by about 6 months, since silver bottomed in late 2001
versus April 2001 for gold. With the help of cycles and Elliot Wave
there will be many gold/silver stocks that can be invested in or traded
after long term cycle highs occur later this year, if their cycles lag
dramatically, as CDE, MNG,
NXG, RGLD and SIL's do, but one
must wait for them to
experience major cycle lows of course. CDE, MNG, NXG, RGLD and SIL's long term cycle
highs will be Wave 1 cycle highs of their new cyclical Bull Market, because they experienced an Elliot Wave
A, B, C down, up, down
cyclical 15-16 month Bear Market from their early 2004 long term cycle
highs until their May 2005 long
term cycle lows.
-
Repurchase agreements (RPs or Repos)
are a huge factor for Federal Reserve Bank Credit. I'm still
in research mode but it looks like there's huge
borrowing going on to buy index futures/options and baskets of indexes'
components (index fund trading I've been discussing
which is a huge factor for gold/silver stocks and many other sectors)
courtesy of the Fed's Open Market Operations ( http://app.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm
) which leads to occasional dramatic spikes in the stock market when
there's a large increase in borrowing from the prior day/week or
occasional
dramatic plunges when there's a large decrease in borrowing from the
prior day/week (Federal Reserve Bank Credit spikes or plunges http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/Current/
). The US repo market reached USD 5 trillion (!) at the end of 2004 AND
is growing at a two-digit pace, which means it's growing at over $500
Million/year!, so index fund trading is becoming even more of a factor.
The US Federal Reserve and the
European Repo Council (a
body of the
International Securities Market Association) both try to estimate the
size of their respective repo markets. At the end of 2004, the US repo
market reached USD 5 trillion and the European one passed EUR 5
trillion in outstandings. Both are growing at a two-digit pace. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repurchase_agreement
- It's becoming obvious that the
reason why NEM
is such a good lead indicator for HUI/XAU (see link) is because
it's a component of SPX (S & P 500), and,
since SPX is the 800 lb gorilla of indexes, it drives index fund
trading, hence SPX is the ultimate lead indicator for HUI/XAU and many
other indexes. Luckily however
SPX's cycles don't match gold/silver stocks' cycles. SPX is in a very
long term downcycle/primary Bear Market since March 2000 while HUI,
NEM, and the XAU are in a very long term upcycle/primary Bull Market
since October (NEM/XAU)/November (HUI) 2000. However, SPX obviously has
a profound
affect on gold/silver stocks' minor intermediate term and short term
cycles due
to index fund trading. Rapid
modest % moves in SPX
cause rapid significant moves in NEM and other gold/silver stocks in
the many indexes affected by SPX.
- Williams
%R is for HUI
(-16.67)/NEM (-84.11)/XAU (-51.72) on 3-3-06 (see latest
charts). It typically hits an extremely overbought level (near 0)
near monthly
cycle highs,
which is
a reliable
indication to look to sell, which
doesn't
mean you mechanically sell, but that you probably will sell very
soon or you may start selling (in 2 or 3 stages). The
converse is
of course true for oversold levels at or below -80, but the most
important consideration by far is cycle channels/trendlines. Indicators
and timing tools are used for finetuning buy/sell decisions after cycle
trendline buy/sell signals suggest it's time to buy/sell (see
charts above, most of you
should
probably be holding until a long term cycle sell signal occurs in 6 to
12 months).
- An important bullish development
is that gold's major intermediate term upcycle trendline since
early February has turned up/increased in strength (see 1 year chart
above).
- The
USD's major intermediate term upcycle appears to have finally peaked,
but 5% follow through is required for a major sell signal, and, will
confirm that a major intermediate term cycle high occurred in mid
November 2005 (see chart above). The USD
appears to be in a Wave C downcycle.
- The Coefficient of Determination
is the square of the correlation coefficient (the true strength of the
correlation is determined by squaring the correlation coefficient) and
explains how much the USD is
determining gold's and silver's price action/variability or the S &
P 500 is determining gold's or silver's price action/variability. The
US Dollar determines 13.69%
(+37%
times +37% = 13.69%)
of gold's price action/variability now
since the USD's correlation coefficient
with gold is +37%
for the past 180 trading
days as of 3-3-06. The USD determines
21.16% of silver's price action/variability since the USD's correlation coefficient with
silver is 46% for the past 180 trading days on 3-3-06. Notice
that the correlation is now
positive, so gold (and silver) will get a boost if the US Dollar
rises, which is the opposite of the usual
negative correlation where US Dollar strength leads to gold weakness
and US Dollar weakness leads to gold strength. The
correlation coefficient, r, provides the direction of the correlation (+ or -) but only the square root of the strength
of the correlation. The coefficient of determination, r2, provides the true strength of the
correlation but without indicating
its direction. Both of them must be used to fully understand the entire
picture regarding correlation's effect. For the time being the US Dollar is only
a very minor factor for precious metals.
- Many of the bullets haven't
changed from last week because this is a system ("Trade the
Cycles") and because some are reading this for the first time. Some
bullets are needed for reference purposes or to revisit important
developments in the precious metals sector. "Trade the
Cycles" is a relatively new system (began in 2003) that only reached a
well developed state in 2005. Major buy/sell signal requirements were
improved (really were developed for the first time) in 2005.
- The major lesson learned from
the fact that the downcycle
from 9-30's (all dates 2005)
monthly cycle high
to 10-5's cycle low was a short term/weekly one (Elliot Wave A of an A,
B, C downcycle) not a monthly one is that a downcycle's trendline
usually begins
relatively flat. The downcycle from 9-30 to 10-5 DID begin relatively flat from
a short term cycle perspective, with flatness on 9-30 that wasn't
evident on the daily chart. On a daily chart a monthly downcycle
trendline
will almost always begin relatively flat, with one or two short term
cycle highs not far below the monthly cycle highs. That
was the best clue that 10-5's
cycle lows probably weren't monthly ones. HUI, NEM, and the XAU's
downcycle trendlines fell off a cliff from 9-30 until 10-5's cycle low
on the daily charts, which meant that 10-5's cycle lows were probably
short term rather than monthly cycle lows. Therefore,
it's very
important to keep in mind the nature of cycles and the fact that they
tend
to begin relatively flat. Also, the downcycle from 9-30 to 10-5 was a relatively brief and shallow
downcycle by monthly downcycle standards, which
was another indication that it
probably wasn't the monthly cycle bottoming.
-
Once a cycle's parabola/parabolic
trendline sell signal occurs it's time to get out (if you're trading
that
cycle timeframe), which is what happened
recently, when HUI, NEM, the XAU, and gold hitting 2% follow through
monthly cycle
parabolic
trendline sell
signals in a recent monthly upcycle. HUI, NEM, and the XAU rolled over
dramatically following their
2%
monthly cycle sell
signals, with HUI gaining only +1.41% in the nine sessions from 9-19
until 9-30 2005. Even if modestly or even significantly higher highs
occur
and
a monthly upcycle is still in place until proven
otherwise, risk is far too high to remain long following a 2% monthly
cycle parabolic trendline sell
signal, because of the
dramatic decline in the rate of ascent (monthly
upcycle dramatically rolls over and enters the flat topping part of the
cycle). The important thing to remember is
that the 2% follow through parabolic trendline sell signals don't
guarantee
that the monthly cycle high has occurred (though it often has), but it
does clearly indicate that risk is far
too high to remain long because the cycle has entered the relatively
flat topping area.
- When an upcycle's parabolic
trendline, or "parabola" as I like to call it, breaks down, substantial
declines almost always occur (see first chart and the USD chart). Once
a cycle
dramatically rolls over (rate of ascent declines dramatically),
it's usually time to take profits if you're trading that cycle
timeframe. Risk
skyrockets following parabolic trendline sell signals as discussed in
previous updates. Sideways action is a
sign that a cycle high or low has occurred or is imminent. The best
time to buy or sell is usually during sideways action after a cycle's
"parabola" has broken down (or is broken to the upside). Almost all
cycles have
parabolic shaped trendlines, but, during the final spike move (or
plunge/inverse spike for downcycles) some
judgement is required as to what the parabolic or nearly vertical
trendline is, which is the final segment of the "parabola."
- You must chart the cycles for
the stocks you trade/invest in, because they can be radically different
than those of HUI, NEM, and
the XAU. For example, CDE and SIL just hit long term cycle lows in May
2005 versus HUI, NEM, and
the XAU doing so on May 10, 2004.
- It can take a while for a major
upcycle's trendline to establish itself. HUI
is more volatile and therefore tends to have more uncertainty than NEM
and the XAU. This is one of the good reasons to look at three major
upcycles (HUI,
NEM, and the XAU) rather than one. Also, NEM, being a reliable lead
indicator and the largest market cap component of HUI and the XAU, has the
most important cycles. The
long term upcycle's (since May 10, 2004) rising bottoms trendline
didn't exist until May 16, 2005's major intermediate term cycle lows
(HUI,
NEM, and the XAU. See first
chart above and the HUI chart dated August 5). It took slightly over a year to
establish itself and ended up being very flat, probably because the
long term cycle lows occurred well above the very long term upcycle
trendline (see top
chart above). The
very important point I'm trying to make is to understand
that markets do reliably
experience cycles (look at the charts above) even though it can take a
while for a cycle's
trendline to clearly establish itself, which can lead to surprises with
shorter
cycles.
- The major intermediate
term upcycle trendlines since May 16, 2005 for HUI, NEM, and the XAU (see
charts above, gold
since early February, see it's 1 year
chart)
should become more parabolic/sharply rising over time (clearly did
recently), as cycles almost
always do, and given that this should be the sharply rising phase of
the long term upcycle (began on 5-10-04), dramatic gains should
occur. HUI, NEM, and the XAU
should approximately double from their major intermediate
term cycle lows on 5-16-05 to their long term cycle highs as discussed
in previous updates. This major
intermediate
term upcycle should last about twice as long as the previous one (6
months)
from 5-10-04 until 11-17-04 and see about twice the gains (100% or more
versus HUI's 51.50% from
5-10-04 until 11-17-04). Note
in HUI's 5 year chart dated 6-29-05 (top chart above) that the long
term cycles are
getting longer. The previous long term upcycle's parabolic phase lasted
about 9 months, so it's reasonable to assume that this one will last
one year or more (now estimated to end July 2006).
- I update my gold/silver stock
"Current Assessment" near the top of my home page (middle of the second bullet)
typically weekly,
so near critical times
especially, you may want to check it out. Also, my "Trade the Cycles" Blog
is updated usually two or three times a day.
- Gold put in a major bottom near
$410 in
early February 2005,
so it led the stocks pricewise but didn't flash a major buy signal
until June 2005 (see 1 year chart below), a few weeks after HUI,
NEM, and the XAU did (see HUI chart dated 6-3-05). So, "major cycle
effect wise" gold still lagged gold stocks even though pricewise it
bottomed
earlier, which is the first time I've seen gold lead gold stocks
pricewise. Gold stocks still
led gold in that they flashed a major intermediate term cycle buy
signal a few weeks before gold did.
- If you're trading cycles you
should sell whenever a parabolic trendline breaks down for whatever
cycle timeframes you're trading (trade
parabolas
basically, see the first chart and other charts above, that have
an ever increasing rate
of ascent for upcycles or an
ever increasing rate of
descent for downcycles, use 2%
follow through for minor buy/sell signals and 5% plus the NEM Lead
Indicator for major buy/sell
signals as previously discussed).
- Most of you should not be
trading minor intermediate
term cycles, but should
be holding for the next approximately 6 to 9 months (the HUI 5 year
charts dated
6-29-05 and 5-12-05 above shows that the long term cycles are getting
longer),
during which dramatic gains should occur for HUI, NEM, and the XAU because this is,
according to the nature of cycles, the parabolic/sharply rising phase
of the long term upcycle that began on May 10, 2004. HUI, NEM, and the XAU were very flat during
the early phase of their long term upcycles, which isn't too surprising
since cycles tend to begin relatively flat and become increasingly
parabolic/sharply rising over time.
- The
XAU 2 year chart dated
5-16-05 above shows the Elliot Wavesque 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 cycle structure
of the major intermediate term
upcycle from 5-10-04 until 11-17-04 as well as the A, B, C correction
from 11-17-04 until 5-16-05. The fact that there are predictable cyclical
patterns for gold/silver stocks and most if not all markets is well
established. The major caveat being that one must know what the longer
cycles are doing in order to time shorter cycle timeframes. The
predictability
of the long term cycles uptrend obviously comes from the very long
term upcycle since late 2000 and knowing that very long term upcycles
(and downcycles) tend to last about 17.2 years. Gold's very long term
downcycle lasted 21 years, from 1980 until April 2001.
- Gold hit a major intermediate
term cycle buy signal (see 1 year chart above) in June 2005 because it
followed
through by more than 5% after breaking it's intermediate term downcycle
trendline in place since early December 2004. This major buy signal
lagged gold stocks' major buy
signal by a few weeks, but this
is the first time that I've seen gold hit a major bottom (early
February 2005) well before gold stocks did (May 16, 2005) in
this very
long term upcycle since late 2000 for gold/silver stocks and since
April 2001
for gold (late 2001 for silver), which is probably a major positive. Gold usually lags
gold stocks at major
cycle highs/lows. Gold peaked in early December 2004 versus HUI, NEM,
and the XAU doing so on 11-17-04 and gold peaked in early April 2004
versus HUI and NEM doing so on 12-2-03 and the XAU doing so on 1-6-04
(long term cycle highs).
- Most of you will do much
better holding
for the next 6 to 9 months as opposed to actively trading, at which
time long term cycle highs should
occur for HUI, NEM, and the XAU. HUI
may rise to about 400-450 in the next 6-9 months. NEM may rise to the
70-75 area in the next 6-9
months. The XAU
may rise to about 180-190 in
the
next 6-9
months.
- Major
intermediate
term cycle lows occurred for HUI,
NEM, and the XAU on 5-16-05 at 165.71 for HUI, at 34.90 for NEM, and at
78.23 for the XAU, that were above their long term cycle lows that
occurred at 163.81 for HUI, at
34.70 for NEM, and at 76.79 for the XAU on 5-10-04.
- Looking at the top chart
above, the 5 year HUI chart showing the 6 long term cycle 5% follow
through buy/sell signals in the gold/silver stock very long term
upcycle, one sees that all 6 long
term cycle buy/sell signals correctly
indicated that the long term cycle high or low was in (the NEM Lead
Indicator is also needed when a potential long term cycle low occurs
well above the very long term upcycle trendline as discussed
previously). The probability
that coincidence/pure luck led to that outcome is only 1.56%
which is
50% raised to the sixth power. So, assuming that a very long term upcycle
remains in effect (they last about 17.2 years on average), there's a
very high probability that long term cycle buy/sell signals will work
in the future.
I can provide countless examples for shorter cycle
timeframes where the parabolic trendline buy/sell signals worked every
time. The caveat is that one must know what the longer cycles are doing
(where their trendlines are) or you might use the wrong trendline
and get an erroneous buy/sell signal.
- The correlation coefficient is
the square root of
the strength
of the correlation. The correlation
coefficient is +37%
on 3-3
(+42%
on 2-24)
for the past 180 trading days
for gold, according to Moore
Research Center,
Inc. For silver the correlation
coefficient with the USD is +46% on 3-3 (+49% on 2-24) for
the past 180 trading days. Silver's
correlation is usually much more positive than gold's because it's more
of an
industrial
metal than gold is, hence it usually has a more positive correlation
with US
economic strength and a strong US Dollar.
- The Coefficient of Determination
is the square of the correlation coefficient (the true strength of the
correlation is determined by squaring the correlation coefficient) and
explains how much the USD is
determining gold's and silver's price action/variability or the S &
P 500 is determining gold's or silver's price action/variability. The US Dollar determines 13.69%
(+37%
times +37% = 13.69%)
of gold's price action/variability now
since the USD's correlation coefficient
with gold is +37%
for the past 180 trading
days as of 3-3-06. The USD determines
21.16% of silver's price action/variability since the USD's correlation coefficient with
silver is 46% for the past 180 trading days on 3-3-06. The
correlation coefficient, r, provides the direction of the correlation (+ or -) but only the square root of the strength
of the correlation. The coefficient of determination, r2, provides the true strength of the
correlation but without indicating
its direction. Both of them must be used to fully understand the entire
picture regarding correlation's effect.
- The report I received via e mail
from Marketocracy for the week ending 3-3-06: "JFR
- Joe F. Rocks's Mutual Fund, Net Asset Value (NAV): $15.19
on 3-3 vs $14.85
on 2-24,
Compliant: Yes, This past week return: +2.34%." HUI (AMEX Gold Bugs
Index) was down -0.50% last week for comparison, so JFR outperformed
HUI in 30 of the past 59 weeks. HUI is a better yardstick than NEM
or the XAU, since it usually outperforms NEM and the XAU (in upcycles).
HUI was up about 70% each year in 2001, 2002, and 2003, so
outperforming HUI is no easy task. My imaginary mutual
fund JFR is
up 51.90% since it's inception on
1-5-05. For the three months ending 2-3-06 my JFR
imaginary gold/silver stock fund at Marketocracy (see link) was the
64th best fund. JFR was better than 97.3% of their funds for the past
year and was better than 99.4% of their funds for the past six months.
I went to about 30% cash near the Wave 3 cycle high, which is near the
allowable 35% limit.
- XAU Implied Volatility fell -1.13% to 34.625
on Friday 3-3 from 35.020 on 3-2 versus a -1.40% decline
in the XAU on 3-3, which is a sharp (2-2.99%) +2.53%
rise
in complacency (-1.13%
+ -1.40%
= -2.53%.
The XAU wall of worry shrank by -2.53%,
therefore complacency rose
by +2.53%)
that portends weakness/a downtrend
during part of Monday 3-6's session (complacency is
usually contrarian, therefore normally portends weakness, until it
reachs an unusually
large level (> 6% increase) where it becomes non contrarian). That weakness/a downtrend
could follow a gap up at the
open and early strength. XAU
Implied Volatility tends to indicate a
trend/tone rather than necessarily a simplistic up or down session. The
XAU
Put/Call Ratio is another very important indicator that may disagree
with XAU Implied Volatility. These indicators must be used in concert
with
cycle channels/trendlines (very long term, cyclical Bull/Bear, long
term, major intermediate
term, minor intermediate
term, short
term, and very short
term).
- The XAU Put/Call
Ratio is at 0.78629 for the March expiration on 3-3 versus 0.92033 for the March expiration on 2-24 versus 1.07156 for the March expiration on 2-17 versus 1.30761 for the expired February expiration on 2-17
versus 1.17922 for the expired January expiration on 1-20
versus at 1.10113 for the January expiration on 1-13
versus at 0.90369 for the expired December expiration on
12-16 versus at
0.78388 for the November
expiration on 11-4
versus at 0.80360 for the October expiration on 10-14
versus at 0.84470 for the September expiration on 9-9 versus at 0.85337 for the September expiration on 9-2 versus at 1.02491 for the September expiration on 8-26 versus at 0.73494 for the August expiration on 8-12 versus at
0.81863 for the July
expiration on 7-1 versus at 0.91027 for the July expiration on 6-24 versus at
0.76954 for the June
expiration on 6-17 versus at 0.87064 for the June expiration on 6-10 versus at 0.80155 for the June expiration on 6-3 versus at 0.55895 (May expiration) on 5-19 versus at 1.13583 (May expiration) on 4-22. The
XAU Put/Call
Ratio was at 0.65704 for the final January expiration value as of 1-21. The
XAU Put/Call
Ratio was at 0.79348 for the final December expiration as of 12-17-04. The XAU Put/Call
Ratio was at 1.03065 for the final November expiration value as of 11-19-04. The XAU Put/Call
Ratio was at 0.85989 for the final October expiration value as of 10-15. If it
rises
6% or less it portends strength following likely early weakness
(indicated by XAU Implied Volatility). If it falls 6% or less it portends weakness. At
unusually large greater than 6% moves the XAU Put/Call Ratio becomes non
contrarian, so a greater than 6% rise portends weakness (unusually
large rise in fear) and a greater than 6% decline portends strength
(unusually large rise in complacency).
- A major indicator (NEM
Lead Indicator) portending weakness this week (but all indicators and
cycle
channels/trendlines (most important consideration) must be
considered collectively, not in isolation. Think "system.") is
the fact that NEM underperformed the XAU last week
by -6.12%
(+2.12%, +2.29%, -2.11%, +0.03%, -0.14%,
-4.36%, +2.21%, -1.05%, +0.41%, +0.69%, +2.15%, +1.06%, +1.02%, -1.52%, +1.16%, -1.04%, -1.26%, -1.01%, -0.69%, -0.12%, +0.80%, +0.16%, -0.19%, +1.09%, +0.51%, -1.32%, -0.40%, +0.98%, +0.52%, -0.08%, +0.26%, +0.81%, -0.91%, -1.00%, -2.86%, -0.38%, +0.09%, -0.39%,
-0.72%, -0.69%, -1.87%, +0.45%, -2.15%, -1.17%, +0.10%,
+1.83%, +0.08%, +0.44%, and +0.97% the prior 49 weeks): -1.63% vs -1.40%
on 3-3, +2.23%
vs +2.67% on 3-2, +0.09% vs +1.59% on 3-1, -3.40% vs -1.71% on 2-28, -5.71% vs -3.45%
on 2-27.
- The
reliable non contrarian (in terms of their trading activity)
gold Commercial
Traders are short gold. They are clearly positioned for gold weakness
(largely because of hedging) with only 108,383 long
futures and options
contracts
versus 268,968 short futures and options contracts
(data as of 2-28-06). The
Commercial
Traders typically correctly begin to take substantial profits (and sell short) as a
cycle rolls over/weakens (following cycle parabolic trendline sell
signals) while the Speculators tend to overshoot when making the
various
trading decisions (buying, selling, shorting, short covering).
- The notoriously contrarian (in terms of their
trading activity) gold Speculators are
correctly positioned for gold strength with 168,365 long
futures
and options contracts versus only 41,853 short futures
and options contracts (data as of 2-28-06).
- The
gold Commercial Traders sold 347
(added 228, 4848, 4679 the
prior
three weeks, sold 15,347 the prior week, added
343, 10,554, 13,289, 6357
the
prior four weeks,) long
futures and options contracts
and added 4974 (covered 1317 the
prior week, added 1765 the prior week, covered
9233, 18,701, 8435 the prior three weeks)
short futures and
options contracts
which portends weakness this week (non
contrarian
indicator).
The
most
important consideration in timing any market is the cycle
channels/trendlines (see chart above) and keep in mind that the data is as
of 2-28-06, so the data is
somewhat stale (for short term cycle trading) by the time it's
analyzed,
but is highly useful
nonetheless, especially for intermediate term cycle trading (a few
weeks/months).
- The
gold Speculators
(hedge
funds and other speculators/traders) added 4662 (sold
5614, 10,272, 5910 the prior three
weeks, added
44 the prior week, sold
6157 the prior week, added 5541, 2975, 1521
the prior three weeks) long futures
and options contracts
and covered 2621 (covered 2300, 3511
the prior two weeks, added 5621, 1047,
1783, 3743, 9445, 5824
the prior six weeks)
short futures
and options contracts
which
portends weakness this
week (contrarian
indicator).
The most
important consideration in timing any market is the cycle
channels/trendlines (see
chart above).
- The
reliable non contrarian (in terms of their trading activity)
silver Commercial
Traders are short silver. They are clearly positioned for silver
weakness (largely because of hedging) with only 29,916
long
futures and options contracts versus 94,987 short futures and
options contracts as
of 2-28-06.
- The notoriously contrarian (in terms of their
trading activity) silver Speculators are
correctly positioned for silver strength with 55,554 long
futures
and options contracts versus only 12,041 short futures
and options contracts as of 2-28-06.
- The silver Commercial Traders sold an unusually large
(> 10% decrease in long contracts) 5513 (added 1751, 2313 the
prior two weeks, sold 2508
the
prior week, added 1291 the
prior week, sold 1760
the prior week) long
futures and options contracts
and covered an
unusually large (> 10% decrease in short contracts) 11,487 (added 2390 the prior week, covered 723, 4837, 1269 the prior three weeks)
short futures
and
options contracts which portends weakness this week (non
contrarian indicator), because the unusually large short
covering is a short term contrarian indication, but the unusually
large long liquidation points to some strength, but most of the
strength probably occurred last week because the data is 3 days old
when released and HUI/NEM/XAU's Wave 4 minor intermediate term
downcycle is due to bottom in the next week or two. The
most
important consideration in timing any market is the cycle
channels/trendlines.
- The silver Speculators
(hedge
funds and other speculators/traders) sold 198 (added
1665 the prior week, sold 4298, 4051,
291 the prior three
weeks, added
2413 the prior week) long futures
and options contracts
and added an unusually large (> 10% increase
in short contracts) 4157 (added
730 the prior week, covered 1767, 9
the prior two weeks, added 2570, 1465,
150
the prior three weeks) short futures
and options contracts
which portends weakness this week
(contrarian
indicator), because the unusually large short selling is
a short term non contrarian indication. The
most important consideration in
timing any market is the cycle channels/trendlines.
- The reliable non
contrarian (in terms of their trading activity) USD
Commercial Traders are positioned for US
Dollar weakness (massively net short) with 8071 long
futures and
options contracts versus 23,203 short futures
and
options contracts as of 2-28-06. Last
week they sold an unusually large (>
10% decrease
in short
contracts) 1146 (sold
578, 2011, 1320, 978
the prior four weeks, added 2134, 1893, 1148, 1525
the prior four weeks) long
futures and
options contracts
and covered 998 (added
2079, 4614, 1966
the prior three weeks, covered
20 the
prior week, added 395, 951 the
prior two weeks, covered
5422 the prior
week) short futures and
options contracts
which portends streng